Goldsmith v. Commissioner: Can An Owner of A Personal Service Based S Corporation Take Distributions Without Also Taking a Salary?
|

Goldsmith v. Commissioner: Can An Owner of A Personal Service Based S Corporation Take Distributions Without Also Taking a Salary?

In Goldsmith v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2017-20 (link) the Tax Court held that the payments from the shareholder’s S corporation were not wages. The Tax Court reasoned that the payments to the taxpayer constituted a non-taxable return of capital. The court reached this conclusion even though the taxpayer did not draw a salary for the…

Tax Court: CalPERS Pension Plan Not an “Asset” for Section 108 Insolvency Calculation

Tax Court: CalPERS Pension Plan Not an “Asset” for Section 108 Insolvency Calculation

Takeaway: When calculating insolvency for purposes of the insolvency exclusion of cancellation of indebtedness income, a pension plan may or may not be considered an “asset”.  The determination depends on whether the taxpayer has an ability to utilize the equity in the pension plan (e.g., through a lump-sum distribution, loan, sale, etc.) as a means…

IRS Releases Notice 2015-82, Increases De Minimis Safe Harbor Limit

On Tuesday November 24, 2015, the IRS released Notice 2015-82 (the “Notice”). The Notice increased the de minimis safe harbor limit, for businesses without “applicable financial statements”, from $500 to $2,500. As a result of the Notice, many small businesses will now be able to expense certain items that would have otherwise been depreciated over…

|

Respecting Corporate Formation: Rochlani v Commissioner

Overview How can a corporation have a loss for tax purposes if it does not have any bank accounts, credits cards, or other lines of credit and it does not keep any books or records? The taxpayers in Rochlani v Commissioner found out the hard way.[1] Business Formation and Operations In 2006, Mr. Rochlani (the…

Counting Travel Time for Real Estate Professional Test? Leyh v. Commissioner
|

Counting Travel Time for Real Estate Professional Test? Leyh v. Commissioner

Overview In Leyh v. Commissioner[1], the Tax Court held that the taxpayer’s time incurred while traveling from her home to rental properties to perform a variety of tasks with respect to 12 rental activities counted towards the test of whether the taxpayer was a real estate professional.[2] As a result, the taxpayer was considered a…

Bacon v. Commissioner: Beware, Forms 1099-C Are Not Always Accurate
|

Bacon v. Commissioner: Beware, Forms 1099-C Are Not Always Accurate

Overview The Tax Court determined that the extinguishment of the taxpayer’s debt took place in a closed tax year, even though FEMA issued a 1099-C[1] in an open tax year. As a result, the Tax Court held that the IRS was barred by the statute of limitations from assessing the taxpayer for the federal income…

DMA v. Brohl: US Supreme Court Holds In Favor of DMA
|

DMA v. Brohl: US Supreme Court Holds In Favor of DMA

Overview On Tuesday March 3, 2015, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in favor of the Direct Marketing Association, (“DMA”) in DMA v. Brohl (575 U.S. ____ )(March 3, 2015) and remanded the case back to the Tenth Circuit for further consideration. Although the decision did not come as a surprise, dicta in…

When is a Building Placed in Service: Stine LLC v. USA
|

When is a Building Placed in Service: Stine LLC v. USA

Is it possible to begin depreciating a building before the building opens its doors to customers? Although it seems unintuitive, the answer is yes. In the case of Stine LLC v. USA[1], a Louisiana federal district court held that the taxpayer’s retail building had been “placed in service” despite the fact that the retail stores…

IRS Released Field Advice Memorandum on Ording of ATNOL and WHBAA ATNOLs

On October 17, 2014, the IRS released a field memorandum, FAA 20144201F, that discusses the ordering rule to be applied for the application of alternative tax net operating losses (“ATNOLs”) deduction to offset corporate alternative minimum taxable income (“AMTI”) when the taxpayer has made The Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 – Section 13…

Recent Case: IBM v. Michigan Department of Treasury (Michigan Supreme Court)

On Monday July 14th, the Michigan Supreme Court held in a split decision that IBM had the right to elect to use the evenly weighted three-factor formula from the Multistate Tax Compact (“MTC”) to apportion its income in calculating its 2008 Michigan taxes. The Michigan Department of Treasury argued that the Michigan legislature’s enactment of…